Журнал индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory

CrossRef

СiteFactor

Научная электронная библиотека «Киберленинка»

Портал
(электронная версия)
индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Информация о журнале:

Знание. Понимание. Умение - статья из Википедии

Система Orphus


Инновационные образовательные технологии в России и за рубежом


Московский гуманитарный университет



Электронный журнал "Новые исследования Тувы"



Научно-исследовательская база данных "Российские модели архаизации и неотрадиционализма"




Знание. Понимание. Умение
Главная / Main Page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2014 / No. 4

Osin R. S. The Phenomenon of the Soviet State as a State of Transitional Society

(Moscow University for the Humanities)

Abstract ♦ This article is an attempt at socio-philosophical interpretation of the contradictions of the Soviet state as a state of transitional society.

The article draws both on earlier ideas of Karl Marx on the phased withdrawal of private ownership relations, and on the later theory of the dictatorship of the proletariat. We also take into account the views of contemporary Russian researchers who consider the Soviet society as an uncompleted transition from capitalism to socialism.

This transition is understood as a process comprising two major stages. The first stage includes the elimination of the previously privileged classes (landlords and capitalists) and the establishment of a formal communalization (as reflected in nationalization of the economy and the collectivization of agriculture). At the second stage of the transition, de-facto socialization happens, which means the establishment of socialist relations. We hold that the Soviet society only managed to cope with the first stage, having failed to solve all the problems of the second.

The author examines the ideas of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin about the development of the socialist state and compares them against the real 20th century Soviet experience. This led to a conclusion that the Soviet state as a society with an incomplete transition was initially forced not only to start the direct construction of socialist relations, but also to accomplish tasks not permitted under the previous socio-economic system.

Viewing the contradictions of the Soviet state as stemming from its nature as the state of transitional society helps us better understand the Soviet experiment and the reasons for its failure in the late 20th century.

Keywords: state, Soviet state, Soviet society, dictatorship of the proletariat, Communist formation, bureaucracy, transitional period, formal communalization, socialism.


Osin Roman Sergeyevich, Lecturer, College of Moscow University for the Humanities; Postgraduate, Department of Philosophy, Culturology and Politology, Moscow University for the Humanities. Postal address: Bldg 3, 5 Yunosti St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 111395. Tel: +7 (499) 374-55-11. E-mail: roman.2014.os@gmail.com. Research advisor: Doctor of Philosophy R. I. Kosolapov.

Download

Citation: Osin, R. S. (2014) Fenomen sovetskogo gosudarstva kak gosudarstva obshchestva perekhodnogo tipa [The Phenomenon of the Soviet State as a State of Transitional Society]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 4, pp. 321–330. (In Russ.).

Submission date: 25.05.2014.

RUSSIAN VERSION


REFERENCES

Alekseev, S. S. (1971) Sotsial'naia tsennost' prava v sovetskom obshchestve [Social Value of Law in Soviet Society]. Moscow, Iuridicheskaia literatura Publ. 223 p. (In Russ.).

Alekseev, S. S. (2001) Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniia [A Descent to Law. Searches and Solutions]. Moscow, RATE Publ. 752 p. (In Russ.).

Afanasiev, V. G. (1962) Osnovy filosofskikh znanii [Fundamentals of Philosophical Knowledge]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Sotsekgiz Publ. 400 p. (In Russ.).

Afanasiev, V. G. (1970) Nachal'nyi kurs nauchnogo kommunizma [The Initial Course of Scientific Communism]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. 399 p. (In Russ.).

Bernstein, E. (2011) Usloviia i vozmozhnosti sotsializma i zadachi sotsial-demokratii [Preconditions of Socialism and the Tasks of Social Democracy]. Moscow, URSS Publ. 242 p. (In Russ.).

Voslenskii, M. S. (1991) Nomenklatura. Gospodstvuiushchii klass Sovetskogo Soiuza [Nomenclature. The Ruling Class of the Soviet Union]. Moscow, Sovetskaia Rossiia Publ. ; Oktiabr Publ. 624 p. (In Russ.).

Denisov, A. I. and Radzhabov, S. A. (1982) Sotsialisticheskoe obshchenarodnoe gosudarstvo [The Socialist State of the People]. Dushanbe, Denish Publ. 353 p. (In Russ.).

Dickhut, W. (2004) Restavratsiia kapitalizma v SSSR [The Restoration of Capitalism in the USSR]. Moscow, Slovo Publ. ; St. Petersburg, Pobeda Publ. 512 p. (In Russ.).

Il'enkov, E. V. (2010) Marks i zapadnyi mir [Marx and the Western World]. In: Il'enkov, E. V. Filosofia i kultura [Philosophy and Culture]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publ. ; Voronezh, MODEK Publ. 808 p. Pp. 264–290. (In Russ.).

Kazenov, A. S. and Popov, M. V. (2013) Sovety kak forma vlasti [The Soviets as a Form of Government]. St. Petersburg, Polytechnic University Publ. 129 p. (In Russ.).

Kolganov, A. I. (2012) Chto takoe sotsializm? Marksistskaia versiia [What Is Socialism? The Marxist Version]. Moscow, URSS Publ. 616 p. (In Russ.).

Kosolapov, R. I. (1975) Sotsializm. K voprosam teorii [Socialism. The Issues of Theory]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. 476 p. (In Russ.).

Kosolapov, R. I. (2004) Istina iz Rossii [Truth from Russia]. Tver, Severnaia Korona Publ. 672 p. (In Russ.).

Kudriavtsev, V. N., Azovkin, I. A., Kelina, V. G. et al. (1978) Konstitutsiia razvitogo sotsializma [The Constitution of Developed Socialism]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. 272 p. (In Russ.).

Lenin, V. I. (1969) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works]. 5th edn. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. Vol. 33. xxii, 434 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1957) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. 8. xxii, 706 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1960) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gozpolitizdat Publ. Vol. 17. xxviii, 842 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1961a) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. 19. xxvi, 671 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1961b) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. 20. xxii, 828 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1961c) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. 21. xxviii, 746 p. (In Russ.).

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1964) Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd edn. Moscow, Gozpolizdat Publ. Vol. 36. xxiv, 806 p. (In Russ.).

Polemika o general'noi linii mezhdunarodnogo kommunisticheskogo dvizheniia [The Controversy about the General Line of the International Communist Movement]. (1965) Peking, Izdatel’stvo literatury na inostrannykh iazykakh. 615 p. (In Russ.).

Stalin, I. V. (1951) Sochineniia [Works]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. 13. 423 p. (In Russ.).

Tiul'kin, V. A. and Popov, M. V. (2011) Leninizm i revizionizm v os-novnykh voprosakh teorii i praktiki sotsializma (Diktatura proletariata, ee organizatsionnaia forma i ekonomicheskaia sushchnost') [Leninism and Revisionism in the Fundamental Questions of the Theory and Practice of Socialism (Dictatorship of the Proletariat, Its Organizational Form and Economic Essence)]. Marksizm i sovremennost', no. 1–2 (47–48), pp. 32–40. (In Russ.).

Farberov, N. P. (1962) Obshchenarodnoe gosudarstvo — zakonomernyi rezul'tat razvitiia gosudarstva diktatury proletariat [State of the People as a Natural Successor of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat]. Sovetskoie gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 7, pp. 14–24. (In Russ.).

Fedoseev, P. N., Afanasiev, V. G., Brutents, K. N. et al. (1982) Nauchnyi kommunizm [Scientific Communism] : a textbook. 5th edn. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. 431 p. (In Russ.).

Filosofskii slovar' [The Dictionary of Philosophy] (1972) / ed. by M. M. Rozental. 3rd edn. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. 496 p. (In Russ.).

Hoxha, E. (1997) Imperializm i revoliutsiia [Imperialism and Revolution]. Leningrad [St. Petersburg], Rus’ Publ. 128 p. (In Russ.).

Shebanov, A. F. (1963) Sovetskoe sotsialisticheskoe obshchenarodnoe pravo [Soviet People's Socialist Law]. Moscow, University of Peoples' Friendship Publ. 100 p. (In Russ.).

Iavich, L. S. (1976) Obshchaia teoriia prava [General Theory of Law]. Leningrad, Leningrad University Publ. 286 p. (In Russ.).

XXII s"ezd Kommunisticheskoi partii Sovetskogo Soiuza. 17–31 oktiabria 1961 goda. Stenograficheskii otchet [The 22th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. October 17–31, 1961. Verbatim record] (1962) : in 3 vols. Gospolitizdat Publ. Vol. III. 592 р. (In Russ.).



в начало документа
  Забыли свой пароль?
  Регистрация





  "Знание. Понимание. Умение" № 4 2021
Вышел  в свет
№4 журнала за 2021 г.



Каким станет высшее образование в конце XXI века?
 глобальным и единым для всего мира
 локальным с возрождением традиций национальных образовательных моделей
 каким-то еще
 необходимость в нем отпадет вообще
проголосовать
Московский гуманитарный университет © Редакция Информационного гуманитарного портала «Знание. Понимание. Умение»
Портал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере
СМИ и охраны культурного наследия. Свидетельство о регистрации Эл № ФС77-25026 от 14 июля 2006 г.

Портал зарегистрирован НТЦ «Информрегистр» в Государственном регистре как база данных за № 0220812773.

При использовании материалов индексируемая гиперссылка на портал обязательна.

Яндекс цитирования  Rambler's Top100


Разработка web-сайта: «Интернет Фабрика»